My Weblog

September 1, 2006

Human Rights Watch blood libel

Filed under: Global Jihad, Islam, Israel, NGO, Organisationer, Terror — limewoody @ 6:06 pm

A Malaysian newspaper recently published an article headlined “Israel
deliberately targeting civilians, says Human Rights Watch.”

Turkish newspapers ran similar items, repeating HRW’s statements that
“Israel intentionally bombs civilians.” During the Lebanon War HRW’s press
releases, opeds and interviews with officials were cited in hundreds of
newspapers around the world, providing seeming legitimacy from a “neutral
source” to the violent anti-Israel protests and calls for revenge.
For HRW and executive director Kenneth Roth, Israel is a highly emotional
focus, and their reports are often biased and unreliable.

Roth’s ideological objectives and slipshod methods are illustrated in an
August 18 column published in The Jerusalem Post
(“Indiscriminate Bombardment”). Rejecting claims that “the IDF was doing the
best it could” or that Lebanese civilian deaths “were the result of
Hizbullah hiding its rockets and fighters among civilians,” Roth declared
that this “assertion doesn’t stand up to the facts.” This modern blood libel
accuses Israelis of “indifference to the taking of civilian lives.”

But the factual basis for this article itself was glaringly absent.

Instead, Roth relied on the “halo effect,” (the NGO version of “trust me”),
claiming that HRW “investigated some two dozen bombing incidents in Lebanon.
In none of those cases was Hizbullah anywhere around at the time of the
attack.”

Lacking any verifiable evidence, Roth reassures his readers that HRW
research techniques “cut through people’s incentive to lie.” These
researchers “probed and cross-checked multiple eyewitnesses,” who “were
adamant that Hizbullah was not at the scene of the attack. We examined
bombing sites for evidence of military activity such as trenches, destroyed
rocket launchers and military equipment, or dead or wounded fighters….”

ROTH DOES not provide names, but it is likely that Lucy Mair, HRW’s
researcher for Israeli/Palestinian issues, was involved. A number of HRW’s
statements on the Lebanon war provided Mair’s name and a Beirut phone
number. Before coming to HRW, she published anti-Israel propaganda in
pro-Palestinian platforms such as the “Electronic Intifada.” This is hardly
a credible biography for an “independent” researcher.

Furthermore, none of Roth’s other claims can be checked, and they are
totally inconsistent with the hard evidence, such as the
4,000 missiles launched by Hizbullah at Israeli civilians during this
period.

Reporters from The New York Times, The New Yorker and elsewhere had no
difficulty finding reliable detailed evidence of Hizbullah’s activities in
these areas, but HRW’s “probes” and “searches” came up empty. Perhaps they
were not looking very hard.

And in dismissing the justification for the IDF attack on Kana, Roth relies
on confused interpretations of an article by an Israeli journalist, and
denigrates video footage “trotted out” by the IDF “of Hizbullah firing
rockets from a village.” Instead, Roth makes the patently absurd demand for
a video that would show “that Hizbullah was in a civilian building or
vehicle at the time of an Israeli attack.”

Finally, Roth admits that “Hizbullah certainly should not be let off the
hook” – as if the kidnappings and massive missile bombardments by terrorists
are minor footnotes in terms of human rights. His claim that HRW has
conducted “detailed investigations of the militia’s obvious war crimes” is
also inconsistent with the evidence. Of the 24 HRW statements and opeds
during this war, as listed on NGO Monitor, most targeted Israel, and the
only lengthy study, of over 50 pages, also focused on allegations against
Israel. HRW’s very limited criticisms of Hizbullah, like its statements on
Palestinian terror, appear to be little more than fig leaves.

In assessing HRW’s biased and unprofessional performance in the Lebanon War,
previous examples provide a consistent picture. In October 2004, Roth flew
to Jerusalem to publicize Razing Rafah, HRW’s glossy 135-page publication
condemning Israel’s anti-terror operations in Gaza. The evidence in this
report, which dismissed the impact of the weapons smuggling through tunnels
from Egypt, was based largely on Palestinian “eyewitnesses” and claims by
Marc Garlasco, HRW’s “military expert.”

Garlasco’s published biosketch shows very limited military experience,
particularly in the areas of tunneling and forensics that were emphasized in
this report. Garlasco was also central to HRW’s public relations campaign
over the Gaza beach incident in June 2006, which supported the Palestinian
version and blamed Israel. In this case as well, Garlasco relied on evidence
provided by the Palestinian police, while ignoring details that were not
consistent with his thesis.

With an annual budget of $50 million, Roth and his funders are obliged to
insure that HRW’s reports are accurate and free of ideological bias. In
contrast, when these reports are instrumental in spreading anti-Israel
sentiment in Malaysia, Turkey, Bangladesh, Europe and elsewhere, the result
is the antithesis of the human rights objectives proclaimed by HRW.
Rather than the independent investigations of Israel that Roth always
demands, it is his HRW’s activities that need to be investigated.
====
The writer is the director of the Program on Conflict Management at Bar-Ilan
University and the editor of NGO Monitor.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525949034&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Advertisements

7 Comments »

  1. >>Furthermore, none of Roth’s other claims can be checked, and they are
    totally inconsistent with the hard evidence, such as the
    4,000 missiles launched by Hizbullah at Israeli civilians during this
    period.

    Actually, the August 23rd ambulance event is given as evidence. It seems to me that if he fell for that fraud, it is possible that there is much more that can be exposed. He should be required to give names, etc that can be fact-checked!

    Comment by Juanita — September 4, 2006 @ 3:22 pm

  2. I will invite all my friends to your blog, you really got a great blog.;`.`~

    Comment by pilates workout rancho santa fe — January 5, 2012 @ 7:04 am

  3. I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one nowadays..

    Comment by truck accident attorneys phoenix az — January 5, 2012 @ 7:04 am

  4. Incidentally, I dont think Marthas a pathological liar, I think shes a combination of disinterested and misinformed. Maybe shes qualified to be a volunteer at a local hospital.

    Comment by pharmacy services uk — January 5, 2012 @ 7:04 am

  5. Roberts,you need to read the founders letters and then tell me they werent religeous!

    Comment by effective direct mail services inc — January 5, 2012 @ 7:04 am

  6. Thanks to the operate you might have put into this put up, it aids clear up some inquiries I had.I will bookmark your internet site mainly because your posts are pretty educational.We understand your posts and look forward to coming back

    Comment by Write A Book — January 5, 2012 @ 7:04 am

  7. i bookmarked this! looking for updates.. some times its a pain in the ass to read what blog owners wrote but this website is really user friendly ! . Additional A rise in.

    Comment by au pair cost — January 5, 2012 @ 7:05 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: